In an unusual gesture and betraying his own oath not to talk about the organization, and we assume he has authorized its competent authority, an alleged oath of "Orchestra" or "National Organization El Yunque has requested an opinion column to the Mexican newspaper AMCOM.MX Of course, writing under the pseudonym "Hugo Whatts" which is supposed to be the one that has within its own paramilitary organization. Its so far are a few columns mixture of disqualification, current political pseudoanálisis Mexican apology for his organization, mixed with Catholic pseudopredicación cheap. With cheap, I mean that is unreliable because it responds to what the jurors are as directed and scheduled training in militancy submissive, and not what the Catholic Church holds in his teaching. However, in a half gestoque is fraud, half arrogance, wants to be heard Yunque, perhaps because once discovered their dirty political organization and methods over the decades, needs a facelift to keep "influencing" the most gullible and if possible, keep driving to politicians who are moving away from their methods and objectives.
Let's go looking here your public and trickery, removing those arguments which aims to inoculate friendly face on the Internet and the public about the sinister Catholic organization called El Yunque, or "Organization of the Common Good" . Go
time a reaction is given a space in the print media a guy who writes under pseudonyms and therefore may disqualify and manipulate at will and also with absolute impunity:
Under the responsibility of editor
Historically, a column unsigned or pseudonymous is the responsibility of editor in chief, or as we say in Mexico, the director of publication. In this sense, the new partnership appeared in the newspaper PM, Column O , signed by Hugo Whatts , falls squarely in that case.
In the second of his appearances, the first Friday in April, article of yore, which claims to be a disquisition from inside the anvil, devotes half its space to insult two respected journalists in the city of León, Antonio Rocha and Miguel Zacarias . To accept in its pages an attack under a pseudonym, it automatically means its editorial direction is taking responsibility on what was said.
not stop calling attention to the fact that AM, among his many battles of recent times, has been emphatic in fighting for the establishment of schemes of transparency in government activities.
not be a bad idea to strengthen the struggles with his own example: Column host of a secret organization for political purposes never publicly accepted and linked to a religious fundamentalist discourse, also signed with a pseudonym, it seems the best way to offer and therefore require, transparency.
Unless a simple maneuver to discredit those who think differently, as is so often seen in this country and something I alluded to the newspaper itself has suffered. Go confusing times in which we live.
************************************************ **************************************
Can you imagine that in Spain is given a space in a newspaper "serious" to the ETA? That's it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment